Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
20 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
PharmaCyte Biotech (PMCB) is a development‑stage biotechnology company focused on a cellulose‑based live‑cell encapsulation platform (Cell‑in‑a‑Box®) and its lead product CypCaps™ for locally advanced, inoperable, non‑metastatic pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The company has no product revenues and runs a very lean operation (two full‑time employees), relying on third parties—notably Austrianova/SG Austria—for manufacturing and key know‑how. Its LAPC IND has been on FDA clinical hold, driving extensive nonclinical, stability and biocompatibility work and creating regulatory and timeline risk; licensed patents have expired and the Board has paused discretionary spending pending reassessment of the SG Austria relationship. Cash was roughly $13–15M in mid‑2025 with management saying that existing liquidity may cover ~12 months, but resolution of the FDA hold, manufacturing arrangements and additional capital are critical to progress.
Compensation at PharmaCyte is likely equity‑heavy and transactional rather than salary‑driven, consistent with the company’s small headcount, lack of revenues and explicit reductions in stock‑based compensation fair‑value expense (G&A fell ~36%). Management incentives will logically be tied to discrete biotech milestones that create value—lifting the FDA clinical hold, securing a stable cGMP manufacturing partner or licensing/partnership deals, and successful financings or clinical trial starts—rather than near‑term operating metrics. The company’s financial statements call out large noncash and fair‑value gains/losses from convertible instruments, warrants and related‑party investments; because these items materially swing reported earnings, executive pay tied to accounting or valuation milestones could introduce short‑term volatility in realized compensation. Finally, transaction features in prior financings (convertible preferreds, redemption triggers and dividend provisions) suggest some senior executives or directors may receive or negotiate financing‑linked compensation (warrants, preferreds) that vests or converts on financing/exit events.
With a tiny insider base and equity‑heavy pay, insider transactions at PharmaCyte can be highly informative: purchases may signal management conviction about the IND path or financing needs, while post‑financing or post‑redemption sales can reflect liquidity events rather than negative views. Watch for Form 4 filings around major catalysts—FDA communications, manufacturing/SG Austria updates, PIPEs/private placements, or material related‑party transactions (TNF/Femasys)—since the company’s reported valuation swings and financing mechanics have driven meaningful mark‑to‑market volatility. Regulatory and exchange constraints (SEC rules, Nasdaq listing considerations, blackout windows, and common use of 10b5‑1 plans) will still apply; given the clinical‑hold sensitivity, any insider trading proximate to undisclosed FDA interactions would be especially material and closely scrutinized.