Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
50 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Parsons is an engineering and technology-driven government and infrastructure services contractor that combines systems integration, program management, design engineering and product development across national security and critical infrastructure markets. In FY2024 it generated roughly $6.8B of revenue with $605M of Adjusted EBITDA and two reportable segments: Federal Solutions (59% of revenue; 69% of Adjusted EBITDA) and Critical Infrastructure (41% of revenue; 31% of Adjusted EBITDA). The firm emphasizes lifecycle solutions, AI/ML, cyber, space/defense, digital twins and targeted acquisitions (e.g., BlackSignal, BCC) and reported a backlog near $8.9B (c. $5.9B funded, $3.0B unfunded). Key operational dependencies and risks include U.S. procurement rules (FAR/DFARS/CAS), cybersecurity requirements (CMMC), ITAR/EAR export controls, and seasonality tied to federal and state fiscal cycles.
Compensation at Parsons is likely calibrated to both cash and performance metrics tied to government contracting dynamics — e.g., revenue recognized from funded backlog, Adjusted EBITDA margins, operating cash flow and successful contract awards/re-competes — with additional emphasis on integration of acquisitions and working-capital management. As a cleared government contractor that relies on technical talent, the company uses retention levers such as ESOP participation, long-term equity awards, a dual technical career path and targeted retention/bonus programs for cleared personnel and key engineers. Given recent activity (M&A, convertible-note financing and an active share-repurchase program), pay packages probably balance base salary, annual incentives linked to adjusted financial metrics, and long-term equity/PSUs that vest on multi-year performance and retention to limit turnover and dilution. Regulatory constraints matter: FAR/DFARS allowability rules and executive-compensation caps for government contractors, plus disclosure and clawback policies tied to financial restatements or contract noncompliance, can materially shape incentive design.
Insider trading patterns at Parsons are likely driven by the timing of material contract awards, backlog recognition, large program ramp-ups or terminations (e.g., the recent confidential contract close-out), and material M&A or financing events (convertible note transactions, term loan/revolver replacements). Because much of Parsons’ value sits in funded backlog conversion and award timing, insider buys after large wins or accretive acquisitions can signal management confidence, while insider sales may reflect diversification, ESOP liquidity events or reactions to financing/dilution risks. Trading is also constrained by typical blackout windows around quarterly/annual results and additional pre-clearance requirements given classified/cleared work; executives must be especially careful about material non‑public information tied to procurement, CMMC/ITAR matters or contract close-outs. For traders and researchers, watch insider activity clustered around award announcements, acquisition closes, and debt-equity events, and check for 10b5‑1 plans or disclosures that clarify whether trades were pre-planned.