Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
19 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance Inc. is a Maryland REIT that originates, structures and invests primarily in first mortgage loans and structured financings secured by commercial real estate, with a portfolio concentrated in loans to state‑licensed cannabis operators and property owners. It targets $5M–$200M loans (typically 1–5 year terms), often acting as co‑lender and holding up to about $50M per syndication; as of year‑end 2024 the portfolio was roughly $410M with a weighted‑average YTM IRR ~17% and ~2.2 years to maturity. Operations are externally managed by Chicago Atlantic REIT Manager; funding is a mix of a secured revolver (recently up to $110M), ATM/shelf equity issuance and $50M of 9% senior unsecured notes. Material business risks include federal illegality of cannabis, state licensing limits that can impede collateral remedies, concentration in a handful of borrowers, interest‑rate mismatch, and reliance on capital markets to fund growth.
Compensation is driven by an external manager contract rather than a large internal payroll: a 1.50% annualized base management fee (adjusted downward by certain origination fees), a 20% incentive fee above an 8% Core Earnings hurdle, and reimbursement of manager expenses. This structure ties manager pay closely to originations, portfolio yield and distributable/Core Earnings performance (and therefore to net interest margin, prepayment/fee income and CECL reserve movements reported in MD&A). Recent increases in stock‑based compensation and use of the ATM/shelf for equity suggest equity‑linked pay is also used to retain/align the manager team, but that can dilute existing shareholders. Because the manager provides senior officers, compensation decisions, fee design and fee offsets (origination fee interactions) create potential conflicts between growth/fee generation and long‑term credit quality.
Insiders effectively include principals of the external manager, directors and any executives provided by the Manager; their trading is likely to be correlated with discrete portfolio events (originations, refinancings, prepayment fees), material credit developments (nonaccruals, CECL reserve changes), and capital raises (ATM sales, shelf offerings, revolver/notes transactions). Given the concentrated cannabis focus and regulatory sensitivity, material nonpublic information about borrower workouts, state licensing actions or federal/regulatory developments can move the stock sharply—heightening the importance of blackout periods and Rule 10b5‑1 plans. Also monitor Form 4 activity around equity issuance programs and reported core earnings (the incentive fee hurdle), since insider sales during ATM issuance or purchase activity may reflect liquidity planning tied to equity compensation or the manager’s revenue needs. Regulatory regimes applicable to REITs (SEC disclosure/Section 16 reporting, Regulation FD) plus cannabis legal uncertainty add elevated risk that trading patterns precede material outcomes.