Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
13 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
B. Riley Financial is a diversified financial services platform combining capital-markets operations (underwriting, research, institutional sales & trading, securities lending), direct lending and opportunistic principal investing, asset and wealth management, advisory/consulting, and ownership of non-financial businesses (communications, consumer products Targus, and e-commerce Nogin). The firm is capital‑intensive and cyclical: it runs proprietary trading and credit exposures alongside fee businesses, had ~$20.7B in Wealth AUM at year‑end 2024 before a April 2025 partial wealth divestiture (~$4B AUM), and operates with significant regulatory oversight (SEC/FINRA, Advisers Act, FCC/product compliance). Management has prioritized deleveraging and liquidity through multiple monetizations and financings (debt fell from $2.4B to $1.8B in 2024; Oaktree‑backed facility and 8% second‑lien New Notes were issued). Recent large markdowns, goodwill impairments and credit losses (Freedom VCM, Conn’s, Nogin) make earnings and balance‑sheet metrics highly volatile.
Given the firm’s mix of fee and capital‑intensive businesses, executive pay is likely tied to a combination of short‑term revenue/EBITDA and longer‑term balance‑sheet and credit metrics — e.g., trading/securities‑lending revenue, realized/unrealized investment performance, loan loss provisions, AUM retention/growth in wealth management, and successful asset monetizations. In practice that tends to produce mixed compensation structures: base salary and annual bonuses tied to operating results and cash flow, with long‑term equity/instrument grants (stock/options/warrants) or performance‑based awards tied to deleveraging, capital returns, or multi‑year ROIC metrics; recent financings that included warrants and exchanges increase the number and form of equity‑linked instruments in the capital base. Because fair‑value accounting, impairment risk and credit outcomes materially drive reported earnings, boards will typically set performance targets that neutralize one‑time markdowns or include clawback/forfeiture provisions tied to restatements, misconduct, or covenant breaches. Regulatory oversight (FINRA/Advisers Act) and recent SEC scrutiny/internal control observations increase the likelihood of tighter governance, formalized blackout windows, and disclosure‑oriented pay practices.
Insider activity at B. Riley is likely to cluster around clearly material corporate events — asset sales/monetizations, debt financings (Oaktree facility, New Notes), major impairment or bankruptcy developments (Freedom VCM, Conn’s) and periodic AUM disclosures — since those events can sharply revalue equity and affect dilution from warrants/exchanges. Officers and 10% owners remain subject to Section 16 reporting (Form 4s) and are likely to rely on 10b5‑1 plans or pre‑arranged trading schedules to manage legal risk amid ongoing litigation and SEC subpoenas; look for exercises of options/warrants and equity exchanges reported separately from open‑market buys/sells. Financing agreements and new‑note covenants can impose contractual trading restrictions or transfer lockups, so absence of public sales does not always imply an unwillingness to sell. Given recent large losses and active deleveraging, large insider sales may be interpreted either as routine diversification or a negative signal — traders should watch timing relative to announced monetizations, impairment reversals, and covenant/funding updates.