Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
36 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty materials and components manufacturer operating two segments: Advanced Electronics Solutions (AES) — supplying circuit materials, ceramic substrates, busbars and cooling solutions for EV/HEV, ADAS, wireless infrastructure, renewable energy and computing — and Elastomeric Material Solutions (EMS) — providing polyurethane, silicone, PTFE and UHMWPE-based materials for cushioning, gasketing, sealing and thermal/wire protection across automotive, industrial, medical and aerospace end markets. The business is order-driven with short, cancellable purchase orders, global manufacturing and R&D/innovation centers, ~2,900 customers and ~3,200 employees, and is exposed to raw‑material concentration (copper, PTFE, ceramics, polyol/isocyanates, silver), FX and trade policy risk (notably U.S.–China). Recent results show weakening topline and compressed margins (2024 net sales down 8.6%, operating income margin fell to ~3.0%), with non‑recurring restructuring and impairment charges and ongoing efforts to improve yield, procurement and footprint.
Given Rogers’ capital‑intensive, technology‑and-qualification sales model, executive pay is likely tied to both near‑term financial metrics (revenue, gross margin/adjusted operating income, free cash flow and working capital management) and strategic/operational milestones (successful commercialization/qualification of materials, R&D progress, cost reduction and footprint optimization). Recent focus on restructuring, impairments (ERP, curamik) and cash generation suggests stronger emphasis on cash flow, deleveraging and return metrics in short‑term incentives, while long‑term incentives will commonly use equity (time‑based and performance‑based) to retain technical leaders and align with TSR and multi‑year margin recovery. Compensation plans may include clawback/recoupment clauses and compliance triggers tied to environmental, export control and litigation outcomes (notably asbestos reserves), and the board will likely layer retention or special awards around critical M&A or JV transactions referenced in filings.
Insider activity should be interpreted in the context of volatile, order‑driven demand (particularly EV/HEV inventory destocking) and episodic non‑recurring items (restructuring, impairments, JV separations) that create material information events; purchases by insiders can signal confidence in a turnaround, while sales often reflect diversification or tax needs tied to equity vesting. Watch trading around quarterly results, impairment or restructuring announcements, JV dispositions, share buyback programs (management has repurchased shares while paying down debt), and disclosures about asbestos liabilities or ERP risks — these events materially affect valuation and insider timing. Regulatory and policy exposures (export controls, tariffs, environmental rules) increase the likelihood of blackout windows and the use of pre‑arranged Rule 10b5‑1 plans; researchers should monitor filing dates, Form 4 patterns and whether trades occur inside/outside buyback activity to assess signal strength.