Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
10 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Saratoga Investment Corp. is an externally managed, closed-end specialty finance company and SEC-registered BDC that provides customized senior/unitranche first- and second-lien term loans, mezzanine debt and selective equity to U.S. middle‑market companies (generally EBITDA $2–$50M). The portfolio is concentrated in floating-rate, interest‑only first‑lien term loans (≈88.7% of fair value) with a weighted average yield near 10–11% and meaningful exposure to non‑investment grade credits, SBIC‑guaranteed debentures and a first‑loss CLO position. The firm has no direct employees; Saratoga Investment Advisors runs investment sourcing, monitoring and executive functions under a management agreement, and portfolio and liquidity dynamics (repayments, restructurings and market yields) materially drive near‑term results.
Compensation is paid to the external adviser rather than to in‑house executives: a 1.75% annual base management fee on gross assets plus a two‑part incentive fee (quarterly income‑based hurdle/catch‑up and a cumulative annual 20% capital gains fee). That fee design aligns pay to yield, realized gains and NAV appreciation, so advisor/management economics rise with higher portfolio yields, realizations and favorable valuation reversals (which drove incentive fees and expenses higher in FY2025). Because incentive fees depend on accrual and realization methodologies (capital gains accrual, non‑accrual interest/PIK recognition and ASC 820 valuations), timing and valuation judgments materially affect reported incentive compensation and the adviser’s pay volatility. Finally, regulatory constraints (1940 Act asset‑coverage requirements, SBIC rules and borrowing covenants) can compress gross assets and thus reduce base fees, making fee income sensitive to leverage and capital‑raising activity (e.g., ATM issuances).
Insider trading activity should be interpreted in the context of subjective valuations, accruals and frequent portfolio realizations—material mark reversals, restructurings or recognition of previously non‑accrued interest (e.g., Knowland) can create abrupt NAV moves that precede or follow insider trades. Because the company is externally managed and executives are adviser employees, watch Form 4 filings from both Saratoga’s directors/officers and key adviser personnel; look for Rule 10b5‑1 plans or clustered trades around ATM equity issuances (the ATM program and equity issuance materially affect share count and dilution). Regulatory and Section 16 short‑swing rules, 1940 Act related limitations on affiliated transactions and SBIC oversight impose timing and governance frictions, so insiders may favor planned trading windows and 10b5‑1 plans—unusual pre‑announcement sales or trades ahead of covenant pressures, refinancing actions or valuation write‑downs merit closer scrutiny.