Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
38 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Surgery Partners, Inc. is a national outpatient surgical services operator that runs an integrated delivery model of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), short‑stay surgical hospitals and multispecialty physician practices. As of year‑end 2024 the company owned or operated 161 surgical facilities (142 ASCs and 19 licensed surgical hospitals), generated roughly $3.1 billion of patient services revenue, and reports a payor mix of ~53.5% private insurance, ~41.1% government and ~2.7% self‑pay. Management cites growth from same‑facility volume and acuity improvements, targeted physician recruitment/engagement, and acquisitive expansion, while key operational risks include heavy regulatory oversight (Anti‑Kickback/Stark, HIPAA), payor reimbursement trends and labor/cost pressures. Liquidity and capital structure are material business drivers: Surgery Partners completed sizable refinancings in 2024 (2032 senior notes, term loans, and a revolver) and discloses substantial contractual obligations.
Given the business model and the company’s disclosures, executive pay is likely heavily tied to operational and capital‑structure metrics rather than GAAP net income: Adjusted EBITDA, Credit Agreement EBITDA (covenant metrics), days‑adjusted same‑facility revenue, revenue per case, case volumes, operating cash flow and successful M&A integration are obvious performance levers. Compensation plans in the Healthcare / Medical Care Facilities sector typically combine salary, annual cash incentives (driven by short‑term financial and operational targets), and long‑term equity or performance awards that vest based on multi‑year EBITDA, TSR or acquisition/development milestones; Surgery Partners’ frequent acquisitions and refinancing activity make transaction and liquidity‑related targets especially relevant. Regulatory compliance, quality/safety outcomes and credentialing/physician engagement metrics are also likely to appear in incentive scorecards because enforcement or referral‑rule failures can materially affect revenue and reputation; companies in this space often include clawback provisions and compliance gates in incentive pay to mitigate those risks.
Insider activity at Surgery Partners should be evaluated in light of frequent M&A, periodic refinancings and sensitivity to CMS/payor rule changes—material nonpublic information about acquisitions, reimbursement updates, audits or major contract wins/losses can quickly move the stock. Expect common patterns such as insiders selling after equity awards vest or following liquidity events (refinancings, large asset sales), while open market purchases by executives may signal confidence in same‑facility growth or integration prospects; physician‑owners who hold local equity stakes may trade based on facility‑level liquidity or buyouts, which can differ from corporate insider timing. Standard safeguards—Section 16 reporting, blackout windows around earnings and deal closings, and the use of pre‑arranged 10b5‑1 plans—are particularly important here because the company’s financials rely on adjusted metrics and covenant compliance; watch insider disclosures closely around CMS rule release dates, earnings, and announced transactions.