Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
35 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Solid Power (SLDP) develops sulfide-based solid electrolytes (Li2S‑based) and related cell technologies aimed at the electric vehicle market, selling electrolyte material and cell designs/licensing to Tier 1 battery makers and OEMs rather than being a large-scale cell manufacturer. Operations are pilot‑scale R&D and manufacturing (pilot electrolyte lines, pre‑pilot/pilot cell lines, an Electrolyte Innovation Center in Colorado) with expanding engineering presence in Korea and multi‑party collaborations with SK On, BMW and Ford. Revenue remains milestone‑driven and pre‑commercial (SK On accounted for ~$11.8M of 2024 revenue), DOE assistance is material to the planned continuous pilot line, and management characterizes the model as capital‑light but still facing meaningful cash burn and potential need for additional financing. The company employs ~260 technical staff and maintains a substantial patent portfolio while depending on key precursor supplies and partner JDAs for near‑term commercialization.
Compensation is likely a mix of modest cash pay and significant equity‑based incentives common in Industrials/Electrical Equipment & Parts startups — filings already show material stock‑based compensation and forfeitures that affected SG&A. Given the pre‑commercial, milestone‑driven business model, short‑ and long‑term pay is expected to tie heavily to collaborative milestones (SK On site acceptance, DOE milestone payments), technical milestones (pilot‑line commissioning, scale targets), and retention of specialized R&D staff; committees will therefore favor performance‑based vesting and milestone‑linked awards over purely revenue or GAAP profit measures. The volatility from warrant fair‑value remeasurements and milestone timing makes plan design likely to include non‑GAAP or cash‑flow metrics (e.g., milestones achieved, cash burn, licensing/design‑in events) and clawback or holdback provisions related to government grants and partnership obligations. Recent repurchases ($9.07M) and potential future financings also influence incentive design — equity dilution risk and the need to align management with long‑term licensing/partnership success are central compensation drivers.
Insider trading activity should be monitored closely around binary, company‑specific catalysts: SK On site acceptance tests, DOE milestone payments, pilot continuous line construction milestones, major JDA/licensing announcements, and material supply or scale‑up updates — these events materially affect revenue recognition under ASC 808 and share pricing. The company’s use of warrants and private placements (and the significant fair‑value swings in warrant liabilities) means insider holdings can include complex securities that change incentives and may lead to opportunistic sales for diversification; watch Form 4 filings and any disclosed 10b5‑1 plans. Regulatory and contractual constraints are important here: Section 16 reporting, collaborator agreements or government grant conditions can impose trading restrictions, and export‑control or grant compliance risks may create additional blackout windows. Given the pre‑commercial status and ongoing cash burn, insider sales may reflect personal liquidity management as much as views on fundamentals, so interpret transactions in the context of milestone timing and financing needs.