Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
60 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Stoneridge, Inc. is a global supplier of vehicle electronics and systems focused on vehicle intelligence, safety and convenience across commercial vehicles, automotive, off-highway and agricultural markets, with ~21 sites in 14 countries and ~4,450 employees. Its three segments are Control Devices, Electronics and Stoneridge Brazil, and the company has shifted heavily toward embedded “smart” products (≈82% of sales in 2024) with 54% of 2024 revenue from commercial vehicles. The business is cyclical and tied to OEM production cycles and model ramps, operates largely on sole‑source requirement contracts (3–7 years typical), and faces customer concentration, supply‑chain and foreign‑exchange risks. Recent performance shows weakening demand (2024 net loss $16.5M; Q2 2025 net loss $9.4M), rising material pressures, and temporary covenant relief on its credit facility as management prioritizes cash generation, working capital reduction and deleveraging.
Executive pay at Stoneridge is likely structured around a typical auto‑parts mix of base salary, annual cash incentives and equity (RSUs/PSUs) with performance metrics that reflect the company’s operational realities—adjusted operating income/EBITDA, free cash flow/debt reduction, working capital improvement, and program delivery milestones (on‑time launch, warranty rates and quality). Given the company’s move toward higher‑value embedded electronics and long product development cycles (3–7 years), long‑term equity awards and multi‑year performance vesting tied to successful OEM ramps (e.g., MirrorEye/tachograph) and integration of acquisitions are likely emphasized to align incentives with multi‑year program cash flows. Short‑term bonuses will likely weight liquidity and covenant compliance in the near term because of recent covenant amendments and tighter leverage metrics, and R&D/engineering KPIs may be included where customer‑sponsored development and safety/regulatory certifications drive value. Compensation benchmarking will reflect the Consumer Cyclical / Auto Parts peer set, with stronger emphasis on product safety, compliance and warranty metrics than in many other manufacturing subsectors.
Insider trading patterns at Stoneridge should be interpreted in light of cyclical production schedules, OEM award announcements and covenant/liquidity signals: purchases by insiders around visible OEM ramps (MirrorEye, Brazil OEM growth) or after covenant relief and cash‑flow improvement may signal confidence in cash recovery and program execution. Conversely, insider sales coinciding with deteriorating results, equity vesting events (RSU/PSU payouts) or ahead of known seasonal slowdowns and model year shutdowns may be tax‑ or liquidity‑driven rather than informational. Expect routine trading controls: earnings blackout windows, 10b5‑1 plans, and Regulation FD constraints—these are especially relevant given cross‑border operations and material contract negotiations with OEMs; accelerations in filings or trades close to covenant amendments or debt negotiation milestones merit extra scrutiny. Researchers should watch timing relative to quarterly results, OEM launch news, warranty or quality disclosures, and changes in leverage/cash balances (e.g., cash fell from $71.8M YE 2024 to $49.8M at 6/30/25) as contextual signals when evaluating insider transactions.