Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
113 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Surrozen Inc. is a South San Francisco–based biotechnology company developing antibody‑based "Wnt mimetic" biologics (SWAP platform) with a clinical and preclinical focus in ophthalmology. Lead programs include Fzd4‑targeting, multivalent bispecific candidates SZN‑8141 and SZN‑8143 for retinal diseases, plus other eye‑directed assets; the company out‑licensed SZN‑413 to Boehringer Ingelheim and recently discontinued SZN‑043. The firm runs a compact organization (~41 employees), relies heavily on third‑party manufacturing and strategic collaborations, holds a patent portfolio across its platform, and is financed by milestone revenue plus staged PIPE financings that drive near‑term runway. Regulatory pathways (FDA IND/BLA), clinical proof‑of‑concept, and successful partner performance are the primary operational and valuation drivers.
Given Surrozen’s stage and business model, executive pay is likely equity‑heavy and milestone oriented: base salaries supplemented by stock options/RSUs, time‑ and milestone‑vested equity tied to IND submissions, clinical starts, partner milestones (e.g., BI payments), and fundraising success. Cash bonuses or performance awards, if used, are more likely tied to discrete development or partnering events than to GAAP profitability, because noncash financing items (warrant fair‑value swings) materially distort reported net income. Retention and recruitment in a small R&D workforce argue for multi‑year equity vesting and potential sign‑on/retention bonuses; pay programs may also include standard biotech protections (severance, change‑in‑control provisions) and clawback/anti‑hedging clauses to meet healthcare‑compliance and SEC governance expectations.
Insider trades at Surrozen will often cluster around binary clinical and financing milestones (IND clearances, trial nominations, BI milestone payments, PIPE tranches) that materially change valuation and liquidity. Expect heightened volatility from warrant amendments, PIPE closings and the potential for option exercises followed by sales to meet liquidity needs; such financing‑driven accounting items can produce misleading earnings signals, so watch timing of Form 4s relative to those events. Confidentiality obligations in collaboration agreements and standard SEC blackout windows around clinical data/filings will constrain legal trading; many insiders will use pre‑arranged 10b5‑1 plans to manage liquidity without running afoul of insider‑trading rules. Researchers and traders should monitor insider ownership levels, Form 4 filings around IND/partner milestones, and equity issuance/exercise activity that may signal dilution risk.