Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
29 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Neuronetics (STIM) is a commercial-stage neurotechnology company that develops and sells the NeuroStar transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) system for major depressive disorder and related indications. Following the December 2024 acquisition of Greenbrook, Neuronetics operates a vertically integrated model with device sales plus 95 owned Greenbrook treatment centers, shifting the revenue mix toward recurring clinic and treatment-session revenue (treatment sessions accounted for ~70% of U.S. revenue). The company reported $74.9M revenue and a $43.7M net loss in 2024, with material cash burn, a $60M Perceptive term loan and ongoing integration and reimbursement risks. Key operational dependencies include heavy regulatory oversight (FDA, EU MDR, PMDA), third-party manufacturing/suppliers, and payor reimbursement coverage.
Given the shift to a clinic-centric, recurring-revenue model and the integration of Greenbrook, compensation is likely weighted toward performance metrics tied to clinic revenue growth, treatment-session volumes, margin improvement (post-integration cost synergies), and cash-flow or liquidity targets that affect covenant compliance. As a medical-device company, pay packages will typically combine base salary, annual cash incentives tied to revenue/EBITDA/cash-flow milestones, and long-term equity (RSUs/options) that may include retention grants for key Greenbrook operators and milestone or time-based vesting tied to regulatory or commercial targets. The company’s recent net losses, cash depletion and refinancing activity (Perceptive loan, equity raises) make liquidity- and covenant-linked bonuses and change-in-control/retention provisions more likely; impaired R&D charges also increase focus on milestone-driven R&D incentives. Expect frequent use of equity to conserve cash, increasing dilution risk and creating incentive alignment tradeoffs (growth vs. near-term profitability).
Insider transactions should be evaluated with an eye to financing and integration events: executives may trade around secondary offerings, equity raises, or to cover option exercises given cash-poor balance sheets and heavy equity compensation. Material non-public items that could drive insider activity include clinic roll-out and integration milestones, payor/reimbursement decisions, FDA/PMDA regulatory actions, quarterly revenue vs. covenant tests under the Perceptive facility, and announcements about achieving cash-flow breakeven. Watch for clustered insider selling after financings or option vesting, and for opportunistic insider buys (or 10b5‑1 plan purchases) as stronger signals of management confidence; verify trades against company blackout windows, Rule 10b5‑1 plans, and any lock-up/placement restrictions from recent offerings.