Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
130 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
TFS Financial Corp (TFSL) is an Ohio‑based regional savings institution focused on consumer mortgage lending and home‑equity products, with growing first‑mortgage originations and a sizable HELOC portfolio ($3.88B). Recent operating results show loan‑driven revenue growth (loans held for investment ~$15.61B, net interest income up; NIM 1.81%) with deposits of $10.34B (including ~$977.5M brokered CDs) and borrowed funds of $4.88B. Management emphasizes liquidity and capital preservation (Company CET1 ~17.75%, ~$525M in marketable securities, combined contingent funding ~$2.75B) and uses loan sales, interest‑rate swaps and longer‑term FHLB advances to manage interest‑rate risk. Asset quality is strong (serious delinquencies 0.10%, non‑accrual loans $37.3M), while priorities include monitoring HELOC credit risk, deposit roll‑off, and margin pressure from liability repricing.
Compensation at a regional bank like TFSL is likely tied to core banking metrics: NIM, loan growth and yield, credit metrics (provisions, non‑performing loans, allowance levels), efficiency (noninterest expense to assets) and capital ratios (CET1). Given management guidance, bonuses and short‑term incentives probably incorporate risk‑adjusted earnings and credit controls to discourage over‑reliance on higher‑risk HELOC growth; long‑term incentives are likely equity‑based with multi‑year vesting and clawback provisions to align pay with capital preservation and regulatory expectations. The bank’s use of buybacks and periodic intercompany dividends suggests board discretion in payout‑linked compensation decisions, and compensation committees will factor liquidity and supervisory capital thresholds into target setting. Expect adjustments or scorecards for funding cost management (deposit stability, borrowings) and for successful execution of hedging/loan‑sale strategies.
Insider trading patterns at TFSL may be influenced by visible balance‑sheet events (quarterly NIM/loan growth beats, large CD maturities, FHLB borrowings), buyback announcements, and any material disclosures about HELOC concentration or capital actions (e.g., the Dec 2024 intercompany dividend). Executives and directors will be subject to Section 16 reporting (Form 4) and common bank blackout windows around earnings and material developments; many insiders use 10b5‑1 plans to stagger sales. Because the company has significant brokered CDs and deposit maturity cliffs, material funding or rate‑management actions can trigger clustered insider activity; market participants should watch for sales/purchases near buyback authorizations, dividend declarations, and post‑quarter earnings when management signals changes to liquidity or credit posture. Regulatory scrutiny in banking (capital, risk governance and compensation governance) increases the likelihood of formal clawbacks, preclearance rules and tighter insider trading controls.