Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
420 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
ServiceTitan is a vertical SaaS "operating system" for field service trades (plumbing, HVAC, roofing, landscaping) that bundles CRM, field service management, inventory/ERP, payroll/HCM and embedded FinTech (payments and consumer financing) into a single cloud platform. The company sells via digital marketing and a mixed direct sales force and emphasizes deep trade-specific functionality, a large proprietary dataset that powers its Titan Intelligence AI/ML, high retention (>95% gross dollar retention) and rising GTV ($68.5B FY25). Recent results show rapid revenue growth (FY25 revenue $771.9M, +26%) and improving non‑GAAP profitability, while GAAP losses reflect heavy investments in S&M, R&D and IPO-triggered stock compensation.
Compensation is heavily equity‑weighted and growth‑oriented—stock‑based compensation is a material expense (grants tied to IPO vesting and performance RSUs for founders were disclosed), so long‑term incentives (RSUs/PSUs) likely dominate total pay and are structured to reward GTV expansion, subscription/usage revenue growth, product adoption and retention metrics. Management has signaled a growth‑first posture while shifting some customer success costs to sales/expansion to drive share‑of‑wallet, suggesting pay/performance metrics will prioritize net dollar retention, add‑on uptake and platform GTV rather than near‑term GAAP profitability. Given meaningful R&D and go‑to‑market investments, cash bonuses and salary are likely smaller components relative to equity; this raises dilution risk and makes tracking vesting schedules and performance targets critical to understanding incentive alignment.
IPO activity and subsequent IPO‑triggered awards create predictable windows of insider liquidity: post‑IPO vesting and typical lock‑up expirations often lead to clustered insider sales, so monitor vesting schedules and any 10b5‑1 plans. Insider buys can be especially informative here—executive purchases may signal confidence in sustained GTV growth and monetization of FinTech products, while sales may reflect diversification after large equity grants rather than negative sentiment. Regulatory and operational factors (payment/consumer‑finance rules, data privacy, third‑party integrations, and credit‑facility covenant sensitivity) can materially affect short‑term results and therefore insider trading timing; blackout periods around earnings, compliance reviews or material integrations are likely and should be factored into patterns of insider activity.