Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
77 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is a multi-concept casual dining operator (Texas Roadhouse, Bubba’s 33, Jaggers) with 784 restaurants across 49 U.S. states, one U.S. territory and ten foreign countries (666 company‑operated; 118 franchised) as of year‑end 2024. The core Texas Roadhouse concept is a full‑service steakhouse focused on hand‑cut, aged steaks and a broad menu, while Bubba’s 33 is sports‑themed and Jaggers is fast‑casual with drive‑thru. The business is capital‑ and labor‑intensive (large average unit investment and ~95,000 employees), highly seasonal, and materially exposed to beef and other commodity supply chains, local permitting/alcohol licensing, and wage/tipping regulations. Management emphasizes unit economics via an owner‑operator partnership model, centralized procurement, and digital channels to drive traffic and margin improvement.
Compensation is likely structured to align executive and operator incentives with unit economics and cash generation: the company explicitly ties owner‑operator bonuses to restaurant pre‑tax income and uses multi‑year employment agreements for market partners. At the corporate level, annual and long‑term incentives are expected to be linked to comparable restaurant sales, restaurant margin dollars, unit openings/return on invested capital, EPS/cash flow and capital allocation metrics (dividends and share repurchases are a material part of returns). Given the capital intensity and visibility into impairment triggers, long‑term awards may incorporate risk or performance gates tied to restaurant cash flows and asset health. Rising commodity and labor cost pressures also make short‑term productivity and cost‑control measures (food & labor %) common performance levers in bonus plans.
Insiders will be particularly sensitive to same‑store sales, store‑week growth (including anomalous extra weeks), commodity and wage inflation updates, and disclosures about unit openings or franchise acquisitions, since those items materially move guidance and incentive outcomes. The company’s active dividend policy and sizeable buyback authorizations can influence insider liquidity and timing of reported sales; researchers should watch Form 4 filings around buyback announcements or dividend increases. Standard regulatory controls (Section 16 reporting, blackout periods, and common use of Rule 10b5‑1 plans or anti‑hedging/pledging policies) are likely in place and meaningful given frequent access to material non‑public metrics like restaurant cash flows and impairment triggers. Finally, the owner‑operator partnership model creates varying insider profiles—some insiders are hands‑on partners whose compensation is restaurant‑level and may reduce the need for market sales, while corporate executives’ equity incentives may prompt periodic diversification transactions, which should be monitored for pattern and timing relative to earnings and cost‑pressure disclosures.