Insider Trading & Executive Data
Start Free Trial
276 insider trades in the last year. Go beyond summary counts with transaction-level detail, compensation intelligence, and institutional ownership context.
Verizon is a large integrated telecom operator with two primary reportable segments—Consumer and Business—providing wireless and wireline communications, broadband (Fios and fixed wireless access), voice, video and enterprise services (networking, security, managed services and IoT). In 2024 Consumer drove the bulk of revenue (~$102.9B) with ~115 million wireless retail connections and nearly 4.6 million FWA connections, while Business contributed ~$29.5B and serves enterprise and wholesale customers; Verizon also owns an extensive global fiber network and is pursuing the Frontier fiber acquisition. The company emphasizes 5G deployment, fiber expansion, network virtualization and energy-efficiency upgrades, while operating in a capital‑intensive, highly regulated environment with material leverage and significant ongoing capex requirements.
Compensation at Verizon is likely tied closely to operational and cash‑flow metrics that reflect its capital‑intensive model—service revenue growth (including ARPA and FWA/Fios subscriber trends), adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow and capital efficiency are natural short‑ and long‑term performance measures. Typical plan design in this sector blends base salary and annual cash incentives with long‑term equity (RSUs and performance share units) that reward TSR and multi‑year operational targets (EBITDA, FCF, customer‑connection milestones and successful integration of acquisitions such as Frontier). Given large debt levels, regulatory sensitivity and pension/postretirement exposures noted in filings, board compensation committees will also emphasize retention awards for critical talent, change‑in‑control protections and strict stock‑ownership, clawback and risk‑adjustment provisions to align pay with long‑term balance‑sheet health.
Insiders at Verizon operate in a high‑regulation, event‑sensitive context—material nonpublic information often relates to spectrum auctions, regulatory approvals (including the Frontier deal), subscribers/ARPA, major network rollouts and quarterly device upgrade cycles—so trading is heavily constrained by blackout windows and deal‑specific restrictions. Use of Rule 10b5‑1 trading plans is common in telecoms to manage recurring liquidity events (taxes, diversification) while avoiding allegations of trading on MNPI; purchases by insiders tend to carry stronger informational weight than routine sales, which are frequently pre‑planned. Given Verizon’s sizable dividend policy, active buyback programs and elevated leverage, insider transactions should be read through the lens of capital‑allocation views (selling for diversification vs. buying to signal confidence) and potential temporary suspensions of trading around regulatory milestones or major operational disclosures.